An Open Letter to American Academic Institutions: Stand Behind the Evidence

By Neil Singh Bedi, Rachel J. Smith, Marina L. Weiss



Bedi N, Smith R, Weiss M. An open letter to American academic institutions: stand behind the evidence. HPHR. 2023;52.

An Open Letter to American Academic Institutions: Stand Behind the Evidence


In an America that has heavily politicized public health issues such as reproductive rights, the climate crisis, racism, gun violence, and the opioid overdose epidemic, academic institutions have faltered in their responsibility to stand behind evidence. If academic institutions remain silent on critical issues, continue to ignore irrefutable evidence, and fail to provide a comprehensive education to the students that represent the future of the nation, preventable loss of life will continue. Academic institutions and leadership fail to take bold stances, out of concern about upsetting their students, benefactors, and supporters. Any academic institution is morally obligated to defend human rights, operate based on scientific evidence, and speak out against the discriminatory politics and regressive and oppressive movements our nation witnesses today.

The last several years of American life have left us reeling from a pandemic that overwhelmed our healthcare system and killed over one million Americans, due to an ineffectual public health response made controversial by American politics.1,2 The pandemic response has been complicated by an ongoing battle in our nation between scientific experts and evidence and political opinion. This is not unique to COVID-19, however. Several major public health crises are touted as controversial – despite decisive evidence otherwise.


Reproductive rights and freedoms have been seized, severely limiting access to life-saving procedures and medication for nearly one-third of Americans of reproductive age.3,4 Little has been done to combat the intensifying climate crisis that already affects more than 60% of Americans, most recently with the extreme weather in the West, and hurricanes battering the Southeast.5,6,7 We have seen blatant reminders of the racial violence and oppressive history of our country, rife in our healthcare system where Black women have maternal death rates up to 12x higher than White women.8,9 The gun violence epidemic injures or kills 22 children each day, and the opioid crisis killed more than 100,000 people in 2021, alone.10,11 In an America that has heavily politicized these public health issues, academic institutions have faltered in their responsibility to stand behind the evidence. If these institutions remain silent on critical issues and fail to provide a comprehensive education to the students representing the future of the nation, the preventable loss of life will continue.


As graduate students and healthcare providers in Boston and New York City, we are trained to communicate with our patients, clients, and colleagues in an ‘evidence based’ manner – by “conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence”.12  Far too often, the words and actions of our nation’s academic institutions contrast this fundamental principle that they teach. American schools are pillars of American society – centers of knowledge and research – and Americans take note of their stances, relying on them for information and guidance. Furthermore, we expect individuals who achieve a higher education to translate science into policy. In schools’ attempts to remain impartial, however, public health issues are perpetually politicized, and both society and its leaders hold the perception that these issues have little to no scientific or factual support. This false notion manipulates our sociopolitical atmosphere.


Despite the life-threatening effects of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization  ruling, colleges and universities across the country wavered in their responses.13-17 In the face of extreme climate destruction, lawmakers and leading education centers waver in their decisions over fossil fuel use and divestment, and oil lobbyists are allowed to spend inconceivable funds to protect their own interests over our environment.18-21 Although evidence-based practices clearly indicate the value of harm reduction practices to address the opioid overdose epidemic, the reality of American policy strays far from this approach.22 Despite the drastic impacts of race on health outcomes, only seven state legislatures have declared racism a public health crisis.23 There were 646 mass shootings in 2022, yet in a poll of Senate Republicans’ opinions on background check measures, 31 of the 50 gave no response or deflected in their response.24,25


American academic centers bear responsibility for these interconnected crises due to their failure to educate and advise based on evidence and facts.26 We need bold, loud, specific guidance from our educators to effect positive change for our future.


Many students expect these bold stances, but they are seldom taken, out of schools’ concern about upsetting other students, benefactors, and supporters. Institutions waver in taking a position that – despite being backed by concrete scientific evidence, human rights, and basic human dignity – American society and political discourse deem  ‘controversial’. We recognize that there are times when science may be unclear. We further acknowledge that controversy, public disagreement, and logical arguments are vital to a democratic process. However, when the science is clear, and conclusions can be made from evidence, we expect academic institutions to declare that these issues are not controversial at all. Any institution participating in education, healthcare, or scientific advancement is morally obligated to defend human rights, operate based on scientific evidence, and speak out against the regressive and oppressive policies our nation experiences today.


To that effect – in the hopes that adherence to reason becomes the norm – we present the facts:


  1. While individual decisions about terminating a pregnancy may vary, evidence unilaterally supports abortion as necessary healthcare that is fundamental to reproductive justice.27-29
  2. Tremendous evidence proves the relationship between human activity and the climate crisis, and shows that the crisis is worsening and will devastatingly impact the human species, as well as the planet in its entirety.30-32
  3. Insurmountable evidence demonstrates the existence of racism, and its implications on health and society.33-35
  4. Despite the evidence proving its efficacy, leaders refuse to pass and implement common sense firearm legislation that would prevent the epidemic of gun violence in schools and communities.36–38
  5. Hundreds of thousands of deaths have been linked to the opioid overdose epidemic in this country, and yet governments fail to implement effective, evidence-based public health interventions.39-41

We are calling on all academic institutions to take definitive stances in staunch support of the facts and evidence.

Our society requires academic institutions – whose members and stances hold significant influence – to provide reason and evidence to guide the way our society functions and direct us toward a brighter, more just future.





    1. Grimm CA. Hospitals reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly strained health care delivery. Office of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. 2021.
    2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. Published August 27, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    3. Supreme Court of the United States. 597 U. S. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. 2022.
    4. Kirstein M, Dreweke J, Jones RK, Philbin J. 100 Days Post-Roe: At Least 66 Clinics Across 15 US States Have Stopped Offering Abortion Care. Guttmacher Institute. Published October 6, 2022. Accessed April 21, 2023.
    5. Kennedy B. U.S. Concern about climate change is rising, but mainly among Democrats. Pew Research. Published April 16, 2020. Accessed August 28, 2022. CID: 20.500.12592/76k1b8.
    6. Kaplan S. California’s Paradox: Confronting too little water, and too much. The Washington Post. Published January 10, 2023. Accessed April 21, 2023.
    7. The New York Times. Storm updates: Death toll rises as rescuers search for Hurricane Ian Survivors. The New York Times. Published October 3, 2022. Retrieved October 3, 2022, from
    8. Brown DL. Violent deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor reflect a brutal American legacy. June 3, 2020. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    9. Howell EA. Reducing Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;61(2):387-399. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000349. PMID: 29346121; PMCID: PMC5915910.
    10. Brady United. Key statistics – the facts that make us act: gun violence by the numbers. Published January, 2021. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    11. Ahmad FB, Cisewski JA, Rossen LM, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics. Published 2022. Accessed August 27, 2022.
    12. Hines K. Evidence-based medicine. Division of General Internal Medicine. Published 2021. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    13. Declercq E., Barnard-Mayers R., Zephyrin L., Johnson K. The US Maternal Health Divide: The Limited Maternal Health Services and Worse Outcomes of States Proposing New Abortion Restrictions. The Commonwealth Fund. Published December 14, 2022. Accessed April 23, 2023.
    14. Maxmen A. Why hundreds of scientists are weighing in on a high-stakes US abortion case. Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7884):187-189. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02834-7. PMID: 34703018.
    15. Regimbal A. Stanford Medicine put out a statement about Roe. people weren’t happy. SFGATE. Published June 27, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    16. Grumke K. Students are calling on Wash U to take a stronger stance on Missouri’s abortion ban. STLPR. Published June 30, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    17. Finnie H. Harvard Law isn’t just a school – it’s a health care provider. its communications about Roe v. Wade must reflect that. The Harvard Law Record. Published June 28, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    18. Slowiczek J. Oil and gas industry heavily outspends environmental groups on lobbying in California. The Desert Sun. Published March 15, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    19. Whitford E. Divestment gains at some colleges, but can it spread where oil rules? April 28, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022. Available from:
    20. Franta B. The pernicious influence of Big Oil on America’s universities. The New Republic. Published June 8, 2020. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    21. Savage DG. Supreme Court rules for coal-producing states, limits EPA’s power to fight climate change. Los Angeles Times. June 30, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    22. Livingston CJ, Berenji M, Titus TM, et al. American College of Preventive Medicine: Addressing the Opioid Epidemic Through a Prevention Framework. Am J Prev Med. 2022;63(3):454-465. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.021
    23. American Public Health Association. Racism Declarations. Racism is a public health crisis. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    24. Gun Violence Archive. Published April 23, 2023. Accessed April 23, 2023.
    25. Cochrane E, Leatherby L, Parlapiano A, et al. Where Senate Republicans stand on gun legislation. The New York Times. Published May 25, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    26. Alleyne A. Book Banning, Curriculum Restrictions, and the Politicization of US Schools. Center for American Progress. Published September 19, 2022. Accessed April 23, 2023.
    27. Foster DG. The Court is ignoring science. Science. 2022;376(6595):779. doi:10.1126/science.adc9968
    28. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Abortion is healthcare.
    29. The Editors of Scientific American. Abortion rights are good health care and good science. May 05, 2022.
    30. K. Myers, et al. Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later. Environmental Research Letters. Vol.16 No. 10, 104030. October 20, 2021. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774
    31. M. Lynas, et al. Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters. Vol.16 No. 11, 114005 October 19, 2021. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966
    32. Pörtner, H.-O., et. Al. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 37–118, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.002.
    33. American Public Health Association. Racism Declarations. Racism is a public health crisis. Accessed August 28, 2022.
    34. Evans MK, Rosenbaum L, Malina D, Morrissey S, Rubin EJ. Diagnosing and treating systemic racism. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(3):274–6.
    35. Bailey ZD, Feldman JM, Bassett MT. How structural racism works — racist policies as a root cause of U.S. racial health inequities. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384(8):768–73.
    36. Julian Santaella-Tenorio, Magdalena Cerdá, Andrés Villaveces, Sandro Galea, What Do We Know About the Association Between Firearm Legislation and Firearm-Related Injuries?, Epidemiologic Reviews. 2016; 38(1):140–157.
    37. Kirschbaum E. After its own mass shootings, Germany beefed up gun control laws. the number of shootings dropped. Los Angeles Times. June 15, 2016. Accessed August 28, 2022. Available from:
    38. Fisher M. Other countries had mass shootings. then they changed their gun laws. The New York Times. May 25, 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022. Available from:
    39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Death Rate Maps & Graphs: Drug Overdose. Updated January 2022. Accessed August 28, 2022. Available from:
    40. Watson TM, Kolla G, van der Meulen E, Dodd Z. Critical studies of harm reduction: Overdose response in uncertain political times. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;76:102615. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102615
    41. Hudgins A, Uzwiak B, Pizzicato L, Viner K. Barriers to effective care: Specialty drug treatment in Philadelphia. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;131:108639. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108639

About the Author

Neil Singh Bedi

Neil Singh Bedi is a Medical Student at Boston University School of Medicine. He is a Research Scientist at CrisisReady, a crisis planning and response team based at Harvard University and DirectRelief as well as the Boston Trauma Institute, the research group based in the Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery at Boston Medical Center. His research and advocacy work serves at the intersection of public health and clinical care – with a vision to improve health systems to be more sustainable, effective, and equitable. 

Twitter: @nsbedi

ORCID: 0000-0002-7146-2048

Rachel J. Smith

Rachel J. Smith is a Medical Student at Boston University School of Medicine. She is also a Research Assistant at the Clinical Addiction Research and Education program at Boston Medical Center, where she is directly involved in research to reduce the effects of the opioid overdose crisis. In addition to her research efforts, she collaborates extensively with leading public health experts and policy-makers around social health issues in Massachusetts. She also serves as a patient advocate for patients receiving reproductive care in the OB/GYN department at Boston Medical Center.

Twitter: @rachel__smith_

ORCID: 0000-0003-1174-0461

Marina L. Weiss

Marina Weiss is a Master of Social Work Student at the Columbia School of Social Work, and she also works as a Supportive Housing Program Coordinator at BronxWorks. She has focused her career on how local factors, such as the built environment, community relationships, and access to resources impact people’s ability to enjoy high quality life.