Mitigation vs Adaption: Strategies to Deal with Climate Change

By Dr. Natasha Roya Matthews, MBBS, MPH, BSc (Hons), AFFMLM, and
Dr. Candice Carpenter, MD, MBA, MPH, EdM



Matthews N, Carpenter C. Mitigation vs adaptation: strategies to deal with Climate Change. HPHR. 2022;68.

Mitigation vs Adaption: Strategies to Deal with Climate Change


The Global Health Debates is a video series aimed to democratise knowledge of complex global and public health topics into accessible summaries for a diverse audience. We believe that the world’s knowledge should be easily available and understood by all. We believe passionately in the power of knowledge to change attitudes, perspectives, and to inspire people to act in ways that accelerate the world’s growth into a more fair and equitable place.


The Global Health Debates aim to illustrate how issues in public health affect every aspect of day-to-day life. This video series aims to inform and engage the public about issues related to climate change, migration, transnational corporations and decolonisation through discussions with expert panellists. Each debate will define the relevant topics, highlight the latest developments in the field, and aim to underscore the importance of taking action to cause positive change by leaving the audience with actionable take-home points.

Climate change, referring to the long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns, is an evolving threat that has been making our planet increasingly hotter every year. In fact, five of the warmest years since 1880 have occurred in the last decade.1 Currently, there are many global effects of climate change: rising coastal levels lead to the relocation of whole towns, increasing temperatures lead to food and water shortages, and extreme weather events and changes in disease patterns lead to greater mortality.2 Global warming affects us all, but as the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) states, it most significantly affects the “underprivileged, the economically marginalised, and people of colour, for whom climate change is often a key driver of poverty, displacement, hunger, and social unrest.”3 According to the latest IPCC reports, if we don’t limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius in the next decade, this will only get worse.4


While there are still many sceptics who question whether human activity actually affects climate change, there is consensus amongst scientific literature that human activity has indeed exacerbated climate change.4 By releasing heat-trapping pollutants, including carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, into the atmosphere, these greenhouse gases capture and absorb sunlight, trapping the heat and causing the planet to get hotter. This is known as the greenhouse effect.5  Globally, 25% of emissions result from burning coal, natural gas, and oil for electricity and heat, and 24% of emissions result from the agricultural sector.6 On a country by country basis, China and the United States are the biggest emitters accounting for 27% and 11% of all global emissions.7


Currently, there are two schools of thought on the best approach on combating rising temperatures: Some people want to focus their efforts on mitigation, which involves reducing emissions. Others want to focus on adaptation measures by creating new technologies to deal with our new climate reality.8 On the mitigation side, many countries have pledged to reduce emissions through agreements such as the 2015 Paris Agreement, which the US has formally rejoined under the Biden administration.9 The push to reduce the reliance on fossil fuels has also led to the rapid adoption of electric vehicles. From 2019 to 2020, electric car sales have increased 263% in Germany, 202% in France and 140% in the UK.10 Other popular mitigation strategies include carbon pricing, where polluters have to pay financially for the greenhouse gases they generate.11


On the other hand, adaptation strategies help build resilience against increasing temperatures. For example, in city planning, techniques are used to bolster construction to withstand increasingly aggressive climate disasters. Other popular technologies include carbon capture, which aims to remove 90% of CO2 emissions from power plants and industrial facilities, optimising cattle diets with seaweed to reduce emissions, and using climate repair technologies to reflect more sunlight back into space.12,13


Overall, the panelists emphasized the need for an “all of the above approach,” stressing the importance of both mitigation and adaptation strategies. Given the severity of the challenge, all resources have to be dedicated to curbing rising temperatures. While many see novel technologies as a panacea to climate change, the timeline for the necessary technological advancements remains unclear, and implementation may involve risks. For example, the main hurdle in completely switching over to solar and wind power is the lack of high capacity batteries needed to store the requisite energy. However, the solution may involve mining more earth metals which comes at an environmental cost – especially to developing countries. This paradox illustrates how relying completely on adaptation is unrealistic.


In summary, we must continue to raise awareness of climate change by doing simple things like talking to our neighbours and joining advocacy groups to tackling more complex initiatives such as challenging the healthcare supply chain to reduce its carbon footprint.14      Similarly, large corporations must be pressured though punitive taxes and penalties to follow all emissions regulations, such as those set forth in the Clean Air Act.15 This involves ensuring that these companies don’t simply outsource their emissions to developing nations. If we are all mindful about our emissions and our actions, we can potentially reserve some of the damage that’s been done and still save our planet.

Figure 1. Ten Hottest Global Years On Record

Figure 1. Ten Hottest Global Years on Record1

Figure 2. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions By Sector

Figure 2. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector16

Figure 3. World’s Largest Emitters Of Greenhouse Gasses 2019

Figure 3. World’s Largest Emitters of Greenhouse Gasses 20197

Figure 4. Carbon Capture Technology Illustrated

Figure 4. Carbon Capture Technology Illustrated17

Disclosure Statement

The author has no relevant financial disclosures or conflicts of interest.


We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Caleb Dresser, Dr. Matthew J. Eckelman and Dr. Brita Lundberg for their participation as panellists in The Global Health Debates: Climate Change and Health, which made this project possible. We also acknowledge the valuable contributions of our Producer, Dr. Circe Gray Le Compte, and Associate Producers, Dr. Isaac Chan, Mr. Sid Gugale, Ms. Kathleen Guytingco, Dr. Jessica Huang, and Dr. Rennie Qin, who contributed to the initial focus group on climate change and health.


  1. Climate Central. 2020 in Review: Global Temperature Rankings. Climate Central. Published January 14, 2021. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  2. US EPA. Climate Change Indicators: Weather and Climate. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Published June 27, 2016. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  3. MacMillan A, Turrentine J. Global Warming 101. NRDC. Published April 7, 2021. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  4. Allen M, Babiker M, Chen Y. Summary for Policymakers — Global Warming of 1.5 oC. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  5. Reddy PP. Causes of Climate Change. In: Reddy PP, ed. Climate Resilient Agriculture for Ensuring Food Security. Springer India; 2015:17-26. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2199-9_2
  6. Climate Change 2014. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
  7. Larsen K, Pitt H, Grant M, Houser T. China’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Exceeded the Developed World for the First Time in 2019. Rhodium Group. Published May 6, 2021. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  8. VijayaVenkataRaman S, Iniyan S, Goic R. A review of climate change, mitigation and adaptation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(1):878-897. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.009
  9. United Nations. The Paris Agreement. United Nations Climate Change. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  10. Richter F. Chart: Which countries have the largest electric car markets? World Economic Forum. Published February 23, 2021. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  11. Barron AR, Hafstead MAC, Morris A. Policy Insights from Comparing Carbon Pricing Modeling Scenarios.; 2019. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  12. Herzog H. Carbon Capture. MIT Climate Portal. Published September 3, 2020. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  13. Roque BM, Venegas M, Kinley RD, et al. Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) supplementation reduces enteric methane by over 80 percent in beef steers. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247820
  14. Tomson C. Reducing the carbon footprint of hospital-based care. Future Hosp J. 2015;2(1):57. doi:10.7861/futurehosp.2-1-57
  15. US EPA. Clean Air Act. Published May 29, 2015. Accessed September 12, 2022.
  16. US EPA. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Published December 29, 2015. Accessed September 21, 2022.
  17. Shell Corporation. Carbon Capture and Storage. Shell Energy and Innovation. Accessed September 21, 2022.

About the Authors

Dr. Natasha Roya Matthews, MBBS, MPH, BSc (Hons), AFFMLM

Dr. Matthews is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellow in Emergency Medicine, passionate about global health, equity and human rights. Her research interests include developing global health education, migrant health, mental health, elderly health, medical ethics, and law. She is also Executive Producer of the Great Health Debates. Dr. Matthews has long advocated integrating components of global health education into medical school curricula.

Dr. Candice Carpenter, MD, MBA, MPH, EdM

Dr. Carpenter serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of HPHR Journal, and is Founder and Co-CEO of The Boston Public Congress of Public Health. She is also Executive Producer of the Great Health Debates. She is a neurosurgeon-in-training, bio and social entrepreneur, educator, and social justice advocate.